RECLAIMING AGENCY: AI + THE POWER OF NARRATIVE MEDICINE
  • HOME
  • BLOG
  • ARCHIVE
  • HOME
  • BLOG
  • ARCHIVE
Search

EMERGING SERIES, sarah carpenter, 2015

30/6/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture

It is widely appreciated that artists take inspiration from their own life experiences. Having accessed group sessions at the eating disorder clinic at the Maudsley Hospital in 2015, I was compelled to produce a new series reflecting upon my journey.

‘Emerging’ was my first self-portrait series and is special as it allowed me to see my own body objectively as form within a composition in a more self-compassionate light, something that has become increasingly difficult for women today.

I have always felt very lucky to be able to communicate through my work. In my experience, creativity is great at facilitating dialogue. Through this work I wanted to tell my story in my way, with the aspiration that others who share similar experiences may take comfort in sharing and that it may help towards breaking down the stigma surrounding mental illness.

Picture
Picture
Picture
0 Comments

Sue’s short film

10/6/2021

0 Comments

 
Fellow artist Sue Morgan gives us her thoughts on the project, specifically the the idea of recording the patient narrative in a clinical setting.
​

THE DISCUSSION: 

Sue and I had a fruitful discussion about how she might communicate her thoughts. 

Most of our dialogue was through a voice memo exchange which was a first for me.  I found it a really lovely way to communicate - listening to a voice rather than reading it is so friendly and personal.  This method also gave me the opportunity for reflection before responding, helping me to practice thinking before I speak. It was also really practical as you can record whenever you have a moment, and in whatever environment you choose - walking in nature helps to inspire thoughts for sure!

So, Sue decided upon this beautiful diagram with explanatory film to express herself: an artwork in its own right as far as I am concerned! 
​
Picture

'THE SPAR REFLEX' Short film

A huge thank you to Sue for investing so much of her thoughts and time in this - always great to have peer to peer reflection time with those who's input you respect and who's work you hold highly. 
Find more of Sue's work here

AUTHOR: SARAH AND SUE

0 Comments

BETH BLOG

1/5/2021

0 Comments

 
Beth Hopkins is a fellow artist researcher and friend. We are both currently part of a peer group called the BARP'S (Bethlem Artist Researchers Peer Group)

​There are many overlaps in our work, so we sometimes record informal chats sharing our findings, ask questions and generally get lost in  conversation. 

Here we talk about this project and how it connects to other work that we are currently involved in: 
find out more abour The Mental Health and Justice Project
read about / see beth's work in the lancet
Picture
Image Credit: Beth Hopkins. 

AUTHOR: BETH & SARAH

0 Comments

WHAT NARRATIVE

1/4/2021

0 Comments

 
During this R&D period of our project, we have been amassing a treasure trove of ideas and opinions around the experience of the patient narrative. A few weeks ago, we arranged to spend time exploring this area further with the Data Linkage Service User and Carer Advisory Group which was set up to provide Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) for mental health data linkage projects using CRIS data.

We had provided the group with some questions in advance mostly to largely suggest some focus for discussion. These were:

1. What does ‘patient narrative’ mean to you?
2. What are your expectations about how and how much of your narrative is captured in the clinical record?
3. If you feel that your narrative is captured sufficiently, what is it that makes it so?
4. Is it important for your narrative to be captured in the clinical record or do you feel that being heard and understood during the consultation is enough?
5. How do you feel about methods to capture the patient narrative such as audio/video recordings? What other means might enhance this process considering, among other issues, ethics, and accuracy?

In response to ‘what does ‘patient narrative’ mean to you?’, a group member said that it was their story, their journey of fighting mental illness and fighting the system. Their experience was that of not being listened to particularly around medication and side effects. The shortness of psychiatry consultations meant that the experience is a fire-fighting exercise. Having multiple psychiatrists over your journey can mean that a lot of your personal narrative is lost. We reflected on the fact that this issue of a lack of continuity is important and challenging in a mental healthcare system. What we were hearing was that people had progressed in their journey despite the inconsistent care that has been provided, and that they have developed skills to move forward while not feeling listened to. This is not captured at all or identified in current narratives, of course. As you can track or categorise ‘progress’ in different ways (e.g., hospital criteria) identifying it becomes even more complex.

We discussed how CRIS can inform better patient care through its use as a research database. But when we talk to service users, a lot of them are dissatisfied with the patient care throughout their journey. Maybe they have a good clinician at some point, but the negative experiences of the journey are still there. If we could collect people’s narratives and distil information out of that, it would ensure more consistency.

The group expressed its appreciation for the work we are doing on highlighting the patient narratives, which may help to give voice to a part of the service user experience that is largely in the shadows. A group member said there were lots of positive things going on in the South London and Maudsley NHS Trust where patients can express themselves through different media, but this is not always captured or put into the record. If it was captured, it could improve the patient’s wellbeing and also have benefits for other patients.

If things were documented differently, what would that look like? The group discussed how there had to be a fine line between capturing enough information to be heard, but not too much which might risk details being overlooked.

The amount of time you have available to talk was deemed important – as a patient, we pick out the key points of the story and the clinician records that, rather than considering the whole story. The group reflected that the whole story should be listened to, rather than just the highlights.

What is more important: to have a lot of data of our narrative which encapsulates the whole story but may have errors, or to have a shorter snapshot which may be more accurate? A group member said the latter was best, as nothing is worse than misinformation recorded in the record which can then follow you throughout life. If one statement is put on someone’s record, others take it at face value. Having it redacted is technically possible but could be a very difficult and lengthy process. Often the statement will be edited rather than removed. This said a lot about power and control of the narrative. These errors might not be malicious and come from a misunderstanding, but they follow us and means it is our word against theirs. Unless we our record or happen to find out, we might not know what misunderstandings/gaps are in our narrative. A comments section in the record could help with this.
​

Insightful, warm and eye-opening. We visited the group with the intention of unpicking the layers that make a good patient narrative; the small and large details that could contribute to a better representation of what it is that we go through as service users. Suffice to say that our questions felt unimportant and secondary as a poignant issue was brought to light. How can you capture or facilitate a better patient narrative when so many people feel that their fragmented experience has stripped them of the chance to have any narrative at all?


AUTHOR: ANNA

0 Comments

A STORY LOST:

18/3/2021

0 Comments

 
I ask the question "As a patient, do you feel that your narrative is being captured sufficiently within a clinical setting?"
One persons experience of having her narrative lost in translation : 
What is your experience? 

AUTHOR: SARAH 
INTERVIEWEE: ANONYMOUS

0 Comments

BETHLEM ARTISTS RESEARCH PEER GROUP

18/3/2021

0 Comments

 

BETHLEM ARTISTS RESEARCH PEER GROUP


​Today Anna was welcomed into  our weekly drop in.

Some of the interesting themes that arose from the discussion were: 

- Phobia of data (the narrative surrounding this) 
- The title: Electronic Patient Journey system
​(great name indeed!) 
- The parallels with deconstructing and reconstruction in my art practice and with the data (a process of learning for both the machine and I?) 
- Asking questions in multiple ways in order to be more inclusive. 
- The idea of the value model - looking at pros vs cons of documenting narrative in different ways
- Being given the option in the moment to document your own story. 
- Editorial / shorthand/ note taking 
- Offering confirmation that you have understood what someone tells you (a classic teaching technique and also used in metacognition testing) “so what I hear is..... is that correct?” 

Picture
Image: Sarah Carpenter darkroom experimentation
​

AUTHOR: SARAH

0 Comments

THe power of paper

22/2/2021

0 Comments

 
As part of an interview process, I was asked to chose an object that represented power to me. I chose a blank sheet of paper. 

I was given 2min to discuss my choice: 
​

​Having space to write your own narrative =
having power.

AUTHOR: SARAH 

0 Comments

04.01.2021 (A reflection)

12/2/2021

0 Comments

 

CREATIVE RESEARCH

PAPER MAKING


​​Deconstructing and reconstructing my records.
​Creating a fresh blank page ready to tell my own story in my own way.

The story so far...
​
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture

AUTHOR: SARAH

0 Comments

28.01.21

28/1/2021

0 Comments

 

​BUILDING HEALTHCARE AI FOR THE REAL WORLD

Picture

SPEAKER: TOM DYER, BEHOLD.AI

A really interesting talk thinking about AI vs. Humans and computers replicating and replacing human processes.

In research, the outcome is often measured as  human performance vs. AI, so essentially can it be proven that AI is as good or better than humans?

Dyer demonstrated that the combination of AI plus human performance always gives better results than either AI or humans can produce alone. The question is how can we work with AI to improve existing processes and complement human skills?

Dyer spoke of the narrative of AI in the media: The reoccurring theme of robots being a threat to human beings, they will take our jobs and eventually threaten our very existence by replacing us. Robots are seen as a  threat to human beings - we are portrayed as being weaker. 
Picture
Image from film 'Ex Machina'

​Dyer framed things differently, he spoke of AI cooperating with humans, complimenting our skills, being used as a second opinion / cross reference. 

In terms of diagnosis, AI is easily trained to determine severity of symptoms, and easily and accurately decide if a patient needs either immediate treatment, or no treatment at all. This means that the workload of a clinician can be significantly decreased and more time can be spent on more complex cases that need further analysis. 

​The crucial part of the AI puzzle which is yet to be deciphered, is if the machine sees something unfamiliar. Instead of it saying "I'm not sure", it might automatically place something in its nearest  category. These are the instances where we see how vital the clinicians role is and how irreplaceable they are.  


Imagine though, in a clinical setting, AI taking on the  tasks that involve memorising and recalling information (basically what we would define as the  'knowledge" involved), this would mean that clinicians would have more time to engage other important skills such as compassion, empathy and understanding to make a fuller, more rounded diagnosis. 

This resonated with me and my thoughts on our project. Could this lead to more of the patient narrative being heard and given value in the clinical setting? By allowing better resources for a clinician to utalise their human skills (e.g. compassion), richer and more valuable information might be  drawn form from the patient, helping the clinician to make a better assessment. At the same time AI could capture the patient narrative and analyse it  using its knowledge. Together, this would provide a more rounded picture of the patient. 

My mental wellbeing is severely effected by feeling misunderstood. Simply feeling heard is in itself medicine for me. ​

AUTHOR: SARAH

0 Comments

    AUTHOR

    Here you will find blog posts by both Anna and Sarah 

    ARCHIVES

    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020

    CATEGORIES

    All
    ACCESSIBILITY
    ADVANCED DIRECTIVE
    AGENCY
    AI
    ANNA
    ARTWORK
    AUDIO
    BETH
    BETHLEM GALLERY
    COLLABORATION
    COMPASSION
    DECONSTRUCT
    DYSLEXIA
    EHR
    GRAPHIC DESIGN
    HEARING
    HISTORY
    IMAGES
    KCL
    LABANOTATION
    LANGUAGE
    LANGUAGE AS SYMBOLS
    LISTENING
    MEDTECH
    NARRATIVE
    NICK
    PERFORMANCE
    PODCAST
    POETRY
    POWER
    PRINTMAKING
    RECONSTRUCT
    RECORDS
    SARAH
    SPEAKING
    STORY
    SUE
    VISUAL COMMUNICATION

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • HOME
  • BLOG
  • ARCHIVE